Productivity

Test Coverage v/s Code Coverage    A product is not successful unless it serves the purpose of a business. How can you determine its viability then? A well-documented coding and techniques are

Manual vs Automated Code Review   In a Manual Code Review (MCR), the source code is read line by line to check for possible vulnerabilities. This involves a lot of skills, experience,

Static code analysis is a method that examines code and detects software vulnerabilities before running the program. This analysis is capable of identifying quality issues, including.

It is not a mistake to make a mistake, but it is definitely a mistake to repeat a mistake. We have compiled a list of the most common code review

Code coverage is a software testing metric that can help in assessing the test performance and quality aspects of any software. A complete guide to code coverage.

Codegrip is an automated code review tool. You can sign up with your Github and Bitbucket accounts and start analysing your repositories.

Is it possible to write code with zero bugs? In the race of writing bug-free code everyone has forgotten other important aspects of programming.

Building a better code review process   Complicated process but a mixed approach makes code review an indecisive process. Many reviewers are highly aware of practices that complete a code review as

Duplicate code as the name suggests is a repetition of a line or a block of code in the same file or sometimes in the same local environment.

How Microsoft does it's code review?   We discussed how Google practices code review at our other blog which made us more curious about how code reviews are done at organizations that